Arceo

Arceo v. City of Roseville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20232:20-cv-02334California11,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-02334-DAD-DB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE,

AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, et al., FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AS MOOT Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 59, 86) 16 This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss and to strike filed on behalf of defendants Sheriff Devon Bell, Captain David Powers, and the County of Placer (collectively, “moving defendants”). (Doc. No. 59.) The pending motion was taken under submission without oral argument by the previously assigned district judge on May 24, 2022. (Doc. No. 69.) For the reasons explained below, the moving defendants’ motion to dismiss and to strike will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND This case arises from defendants’ alleged failure to provide medical care for plaintiff Alejandro Arceo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.