Sjodin, Jr. v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20231:23-cv-00454California3,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIRK ARDELL SJODIN, JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-00454-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION AND

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., DISMISSING ACTION

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 10, 12)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kirk Ardell Sjodin, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,1 brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint filed in this action on March 24, 2023, which was submitted as a request for an emergency injunction. (ECF No. 1.) On May 5, 2023, the Court issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s request for 27 1 The Court initially denied Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application on March 28, 2023, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.