Kibler

(PC) Peyton v. Kibler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20232:21-cv-00719California1,653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE EDWARD PEYTON, No. 2:21-cv-00719-DJC-KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRIAN KIBLER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a Section 1983 claim against Brian Kibler and several other warden staff members and correctional officers (“Defendants”). (See Complaint (ECF No. 1) (“Compl.”).) Plaintiff earlier brought a motion to compel production of videos against Defendants. (See Pl.’s Mot. to Compel (ECF No. 41) (“MTC”).) Plaintiff’s motion was partially granted by the assigned Magistrate Judge. (See 5/26/2022 Order (ECF No. 60).) Defendants served notice of their compliance with the Magistrate Judge’s order (see ECF No. 63), and later moved to modify the scheduling order (see ECF No. 66). The Magistrate Judge granted Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (see ECF No. 67), from which Plaintiff seeks reconsideration (see Pl.’s Mot. for Recons. (ECF No. 68) (“Motion” or 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.