(PC) Cage v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20231:22-cv-01429California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIM CAGE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-1429 JLT CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS,

AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

A.JOHNSON, et al., COURT TO UPDATE THE DOCKET Defendants. (Doc. 13) 16 Jim Cage seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge screened the allegations of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), and found Plaintiff stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Rojas. (Doc. 10.) However, the magistrate judge also found Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claim against any other named defendant. (Id. at 5-8.) In response to the Screening Order, Plaintiff filed notice that he did not wish to file an amended complaint and was willing to proceed only on the claim found cognizable. (Doc. 11 at 5.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.