(PC) Hampton v. Austin

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20232:20-cv-01001California791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY G. HAMPTON, JR., No. 2:20-cv-01001-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELCH, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On March 31, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 42. Defendant has filed objections. See Objs., ECF No. 43. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.