Hardesty

Hardesty v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Mgt. Dist.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20232:10-cv-02414California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Joseph Hardesty et al., No. 2:10-cv-02414-KJM-KJN Plaintiffs, Consolidated with: 2:12-cv-02457-KJM- v. KIN ORDER Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District et al., Defendants. 17 On August 15, 2023, plaintiff Jay Schneider filed a declaration in opposition to defendant County of Sacramento’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement between defendant and the Schneider plaintiffs. Schneider Decl., ECF No. 722. Litigants represented by counsel may not file documents on their own behalf. United States v. Mendez, No. 11-00356, 2023 WL 2058890, 22 at *2 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2023). Mr. Schneider declares this filing was necessary because his 23 attorney refused to file an opposition on behalf of him and his wife (co-plaintiff, Susan Schneider). Schneider Decl. 8-9. Under this district’s local rules,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.