Goodwin

Goodwin v. Royal Properties

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20231:23-cv-00260California2,543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUCHUN LAFRE GOODWIN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00260-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS ACTION1

v.

ROYAL PROPERTIES, VICTORIA FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD BRAMBLE and ANGELA HILL, 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Duchun Lafre Goodwin (“Plaintiff” or “Goodwin”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the district court dismiss this action and close this case. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any time” if a court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) -(iii); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all litigants proceeding in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.