Cueva

(PC) Chinsami v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20232:23-cv-00567California764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHU CHINSAMI, No. 2:23-cv-00567-TLN-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND AMENDED DANIEL CUEVA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. A review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.