Dean

Dean v. State of CA Dept. of Social Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20232:22-cv-01054California4,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RYAN DEAN and DANA MOORER, No. 2:22-cv-01054-JAM-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND

KIM JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Ryan Dean and Dana Moorer (respectively “R. Dean” or “Moorer”) filed this lawsuit against Kim Johnson (“Johnson”), Director of the State of California Department of Social Services; Kern County Human Services (“KCHS”); Dena Murphy (“Murphy”), Director of KCHS; Trezell West; Jacqueline West; Anna Zavala-Garza (“Zavala-Garza”), and other fictitious persons (collectively “Defendants”). Lief Dean (“L. Dean”) then filed a separate suit against the same Defendants. See Compl., ECF No. 48. In their respective pleadings, R. Dean, Moorer, and L. Dean (collectively “Plaintiffs”) allege constitutional and state law violations relating to Plaintiffs’ separation from Cinsere and Classic Pettus (“the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.