Phull

Gilbert v. Phull

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20231:22-cv-00167California2,738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00167-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

v. OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT AND

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE CLAIMS

SUKHBIR SINGH PHULL, dba Shop N Save Market; JAGJEET SINGH, dba Shop FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD N Save Market; JOSEPH SANDOVAL, Trustee of the SANDOVAL FAMILY TRUST, under instrument dated January 16, 2018; SALLY SANDOVAL, Trustee of the SANDOVAL FAMILY TRUST, under instrument dated January 16, 2018, 18 Defendants. 19 On February 4, 2022, Plaintiff Darren Gilbert commenced this action by filing a complaint against Defendants Sukhbir Singh Phull and Jagjett Singh, doing business as Shop N Save Market, and Joseph Sandoval and Sally Sandoval as Trustees of the Sandoval Family Trust (collectively “Defendants”), alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq (Count I); the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.