Diaz

(PC) Miller v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20231:20-cv-01243California556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS MILLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-1243-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

RENEWED MOTION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS B. CATES, FAYE MONTEGRANDE, (Doc. No. 28)

OLUFEMI OWOLABI, U. BANIGA,

ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY Defendants. INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS TOWARD FILING FEE Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 28). Plaintiff, a former prisoner initiated this action while he was incarcerated at California Correctional Institution. (Doc. No. 1). Although currently released, Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the full amount of the statutory filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). As set forth in the Court’s July 31, 2023 Order, the total amount that remains due towards the $350.00 filing fee is $350.00. (Doc. No. 27 at 3). Due to Plaintiff’s release from custody, there is no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.