Kishbaugh

(PC) Brown v. Kishbaugh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20232:21-cv-00149California2,245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, No. 2:21-cv-00149-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

C. KISHBAUGH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint (SAC) against defendants Kishbaugh, Munoz, and Hutchison. ECF No. 16. Now before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file discovery responses (ECF No. 44), and defendants’ opposition and request for terminating sanctions. ECF No. 45. For the reasons stated below, the court recommends that defendants’ request for terminating sanctions be granted, and that all other outstanding motions be denied as moot. I. Background Plaintiff’s responses to defendants’ requests for production and interrogatories were originally due on July 25, 2022, and he failed to respond. ECF No. 32-1 at 2. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.