Hale

Animal Blood Bank, Inc. v. Hale

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20232:10-cv-02080California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Animal Blood Bank, Inc., et al., No. 2:10-cv-02080-KJM-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Anne S. Hale, 1S Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Animal Blood Bank, Inc. applies to renew the judgment in this action. ECF No. 85. This court entered judgment in August 2013 after granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment. See F&Rs, ECF No. 80, adopted in part, ECF No. 81; Judgment, ECF No. 82. According to plaintiffs counsel, the judgment has not been paid in full. See generally Turner Decl., ECF No. 85-7; see also Appl. Ex. 5, ECF No. 85-6 (recording payments, interest, and amounts due). State law ordinarily governs “in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or 24 execution” in federal courts. Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(2). Under California law, the ten-year period 25 “of enforceability of a money judgment... may be extended by renewal of the judgment.” Cal. 26 Civ. Proc. Code §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.