(PS) Hanible v. County of Solano Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIHANA HANIBLE, No. 2:21-cv-1315 DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants, 17 On January 31, 2023, the court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 51.) On August 1, 2023, plaintiff, who is proceeding in this action pro se, filed a motion for an extension of time with respect to the expert witness deadline contained in the schedule. (ECF No. 63.) Therein, plaintiff explains that plaintiff’s father recently passed away. (Id. at 3.) Defendant has not opposed plaintiff’s motion. “Once the district court ha[s] filed a pretrial scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 . . . that rule’s standards control[].” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607-08 (9th Cir. 1992). “‘Unlike Rule 15(a)’s liberal amendment policy which focuses on the bad faith of the party seeking to interpose an amendment and the prejudice to the 27 The parties have…