(SS) Adame De Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20231:23-cv-01129California1,734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA DE LOS ANGELES ADAME Case No. 1:23-cv-01129-CDB (SS)

DE DIAZ,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ISSUE SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND CONSENT OR REQUEST

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL FOR REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

SECURITY, (Doc. 4) Defendant. 17 Maria De Los Angeles Adame De Diaz (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action on July 28, 2023, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (or “IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s application did not contain sufficient information for the Court to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to proceed IFP, and on August 2, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.