Pizana

Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20231:18-cv-00644California4,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL PIZANA, et al., No. 1:18-cv-00644-ADA-SKO Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND

DENYING, IN PART, SANMEDICA’S

SANMEDICA INT’L, LLC, et al., REQUEST TO SEAL Defendants. (ECF No. 268) 16 I. Procedural Background Pursuant to the Court’s April 27, 2022 order, Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint (“TAC”) on May 18, 2022. (ECF No. 175.) The TAC added a new cause of action, seven new plaintiffs, and fifteen new defendants. (Compare ECF No. 53 at 1 with ECF No. 175 at 1.) In response, Defendants filed a series of motions to dismiss, motions to strike, and motions to transfer venue. (ECF Nos. 189, 190, 217, 218, 220, 224-1, 231, 234, 236, 237.) Plaintiffs filed two omnibus oppositions. One addressed the merits arguments that Defendants raised. (ECF No. 248.) The other responded to challenges to personal jurisdiction and venue. (ECF No. 249.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.