Brewer

(HC) Moreno v. Brewer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20232:23-cv-00117California485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO ANTONIO MORENO, No. 2:23-cv-0117 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BREWER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner proceeds pro se and seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By order filed on June 2, 2023, the court ordered petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as moot. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. In addition, the court’s order filed on June 2, 2023, was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current address. Petitioner’s failure to comply with court rules and failure to respond to court orders 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.