Escobedo
Escobedo v. Jiang
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00205-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) GUITI JIANG, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendants. (ECF No. 18) 14 On August 28, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 18.) In light of 16 the stipulation of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson 17 v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with 18 each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).