Bal

(PC) Hollis v. Bal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20232:13-cv-02145California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, No. 2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. BAL, et al., Defendants. 16 On August 1, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge denied without prejudice Plaintiff Marvin Glenn Hollis’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Appoint Counsel and Request for Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem. See ECF Nos. 185, 188. Plaintiff subsequently filed Objections to the magistrate judge’s order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)1 on August 7, 2023. ECF No. 191. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a renewed Motion for Appointment of a Guadian Ad Litem and Counsel, which the magistrate judge also denied without prejudice. See ECF Nos. 192, 195. On August 24, 2023, Plaintiff again filed Objections to the magistrate judge’s order. See ECF Nos. 197, 199. Because Plaintiff objects to nondispositive rulings, the Court construes Plaintiff’s Objections as motions for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 72(a). See E.D. Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.