Ingram

(PC) Taylor v. Ingram

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20232:21-cv-01042California7,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-1042 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MARSHA INGRAM, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment rights when she (1) wrote a false disciplinary report against him on August 4, 2019, and (2) moved his housing assignment on August 8, 2019, after plaintiff told her that he intended to submit a staff complaint against her. Presently before the court is defendant’s fully briefed motion for partial summary judgment arguing she is entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim that defendant retaliated against him by changing his housing assignment because plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to this claim. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.