Lebeck

(PC) Candler v. Lebeck

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20232:17-cv-02436California1,083 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH CANDLER, No. 2:17-cv-02436-DJC-CKD Plaintiff, v. PRETRIAL ORDER J. LEBECK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is set for trial on October 19, 2023. Following the Final Pretrial Conference and issuance of the Final Pretrial Order, Plaintiff has filed three documents with this court making various requests and raising objections. (See ECF Nos. 87, 88, 90.) The first document filed by Plaintiff is entitled “Plaintiff presenting 13 subpoena for trial witnesses”. (ECF No. 87.) In it, Plaintiff requests that the Court “order the marshals to issue subpoena to said unincarcerated witnesses to Plaintiff can question them during trial.” (Id. at 1.) However, such an order is not necessary for Plaintiff to be able to utilize the United States Marshals Service to serve subpoenas. As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.