Schmidt
Schmidt v. Vision Service Plan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SCHMIDT, on behalf of No. 2:20–cv–2400–KJN himself and the Class and Collective members, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, et al., Defendants.
18 Plaintiff Michael Schmidt moves for preliminary approval of settlement of his class, Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective, and Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims. (ECF No. 44). Defendants Vision Service Plan (VSP), VSP Global, Inc., Marchon Eyewear, Inc., VSP Optical Group, Inc., and Eyefinity, Inc. do not oppose the motion. By and through this motion, plaintiff seeks: (1) conditional certification of the settlement class and FLSA collective; (2) preliminary approval of the settlement; (3) approval of the class notice; (4) appointment of plaintiff as class representative; (5) appointment of plaintiff’s counsel as class counsel; (6) appointment of the settlement administrator; and (7) scheduling 27 1 On consent of both parties, this case was…