Schmidt

Schmidt v. Vision Service Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20232:20-cv-02400California2,730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SCHMIDT, on behalf of No. 2:20–cv–2400–KJN himself and the Class and Collective members, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, et al., Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Michael Schmidt moves for preliminary approval of settlement of his class, Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective, and Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims. (ECF No. 44). Defendants Vision Service Plan (VSP), VSP Global, Inc., Marchon Eyewear, Inc., VSP Optical Group, Inc., and Eyefinity, Inc. do not oppose the motion. By and through this motion, plaintiff seeks: (1) conditional certification of the settlement class and FLSA collective; (2) preliminary approval of the settlement; (3) approval of the class notice; (4) appointment of plaintiff as class representative; (5) appointment of plaintiff’s counsel as class counsel; (6) appointment of the settlement administrator; and (7) scheduling 27 1 On consent of both parties, this case was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.