Hendrix

Hendrix v. City of Madera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20231:23-cv-01212California3,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER C. HENDRIX, Case No. 1:23-cv-01212-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND

v. (Doc. 1) CITY OF MADERA, et al.,

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Alexander C. Hendrix (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action on August 24, 2023. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.