Lake

Lake v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20232:19-cv-01439California2,646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH LAKE, No. 2:19-cv-01439-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., MOTION TO STRIKE/DISMISS Defendants. (Doc. No. 128) 16 This matter is before the court once again, this time on defendants’ motion to strike and/or dismiss filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(f) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 128.) On August 24, 2023, the court took the matter under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 133.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant in part and deny in part defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND On July 10, 2023, plaintiff Joseph Lake filed his operative fourth amended complaint (“4AC”) in this civil rights action against defendants City of Vallejo, City of Vallejo Police Department, City Council of the City of Vallejo, police officer Anthony Romero-Cano, police officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.