(PC)Calderon

(PC)Calderon v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20232:21-cv-01896California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:21-cv-01896-KJM-CKD P Plaintiff, ORDER v.

K ALLISON, ETAL.,

Defendants. 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and dismissed the complaint without leave to amend for failing to comply with 22 the court’s order. Prior Order (Aug. 28. 2023), ECF No. 36. Plaintiff then filed a letter asking the 23 court to “stop ongoing corruption with abuse of power/authority,” which this court construes as a motion to reconsider. Letter at 1, ECF No. 38. A motion for reconsideration or relief from judgment is appropriately brought under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or Rule 60(b). Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F. 2d 1437, 1442 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing Taylor v. Knapp, 871 F. 2d 803, 805 (9th Cir. 1989)). The motion “is 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.