Arceo

Arceo v. City of Roseville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20232:20-cv-02334California5,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-02334-DAD-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS SUTTER

ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER AND

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, et al., SUTTER HEALTH’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. No. 68) 16 This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendants Sutter Roseville Medical Center (“SRMC”) and Sutter Health (collectively, “moving defendants”) on May 24, 2022. (Doc. No. 68.) That motion was taken under submission without oral argument by the previously assigned district judge on August 16, 2022. (Doc. No. 88.) For the reasons explained below, the pending motion for summary judgment will be denied. BACKGROUND This case arises from defendants’ alleged failure to provide medical care for plaintiff Alejandro Arceo while he was suffering a psychiatric episode, which failure allegedly led him to pull out his own eye while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.