Bobbla

(PC) Davis v. Bobbla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20232:22-cv-01658California3,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, AKA No. 2:22-cv-1658 TLN DB P

MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS-ROGERS,

11 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

MANJALA BOBBLA,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s fifth amended1 complaint (ECF No. 19) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. //// //// ////

1 After the original complaint was screened and dismissed (ECF Nos. 1, 8), plaintiff subsequently filed several amended complaints (ECF Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14, 19) and two motions to amend (ECF 26 Nos. 15, 17). The undersigned granted plaintiff’s motions to amend and directed plaintiff to submit an amended complaint within thirty days. Thereafter, plaintiff filed the instant complaint. (ECF No. 19.) Because an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.