Diaz

(PC) Melendez v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20231:20-cv-01393California737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MELENDEZ, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01393-ADA-CDB (PC)

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS

WARDEN ROSEMARY NDOH, JOHN MELENDEZ, JUSTICE DILLON

PAJARILLO, JOSE CANALES, JR., PEDRO

Defendant. CASTRO, EMERSON GAITAN, CARLOS

ESPINOZA, ERIC HERNANDEZ, AND

DANIEL GARCIA WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF Nos. 37, 51)

On April 24, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Plaintiffs John Melendez, Justice Dillon Pajarillo, Jose Canales, Jr., Pedro Castro, Emerson Gaitan, Carlos Espinoza, Eric Hernandez, and Daniel Garcia for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 51.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on Plaintiffs and provided fourteen (14) days for the Plaintiffs’ to file objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.