Costello

(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Costello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20232:23-cv-00253California2,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:23-cv-253-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

v. MIA COSTELLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jean Marc Van den Heuvel, proceeding without counsel in this action, requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The court granted plaintiff’s request, screened the first amended complaint but found it deficient, and granted plaintiff leave to amend. Thereafter, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint in May of 2022, followed by a “notice re clarification” of the second amended complaint and, two months later, another second amended complaint. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 15.) For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed, no further leave be granted, and the case be closed. /// 26 1 This action was directly assigned to the undersigned pursuant to Appendix A sub. (m) of the court’s Local Rules. Further, actions where a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.