Ross

(PC) Duran v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20231:21-cv-01096California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD DURAN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01096-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

v. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

AND CLAIMS

M. ROSS, A. VALDEZ, and E. PARKS,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

Defendants. DOCKET TO REFLECT ONLY NAMED

DEFENDANT

16 (Doc. No. 11)

18 Plaintiff Paul Duran, a prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 25, 2023, this Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 10, “FAC”). As discussed in the July 25, 2023 Screening Order, the FAC states a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive use of force claim against Defendant Ross, but no other claim. (Doc. No. 10 at 1). Specifically, the Court found the FAC did not state any cognizable claim against Defendants Valdez or Parks. (Id. at 8). The Screening Order afforded Plaintiff the opportunity to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.