Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Ridgecrest Restoration Ministries

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20231:23-cv-00191California3,631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-00191-ADA-CDB

COMPANY,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. (Doc. 21) RICHARD ROMEO DAIGLE, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Ohio Security Insurance Company initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendants Ridgecrest Restoration Ministries (“Ridgecrest”), Ridgecrest Vineyard Church, Akop Agazaryan, Gohar Hekimian, and Richard Romeo Daigle on February 8, 2023. (Doc. 1). According to the complaint, Defendants Agazaryan and Hekimian filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, in which they allege that on October 24, 2022, Agazaryan was injured by a vehicle that was owned and registered by Defendant Ridgecrest and operated by Defendant Daigle. (Doc. 1 at ⁋⁋ 10, 12-13). Plaintiff issued an insurance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.