Griffith

(PC) Jackson v. Griffith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20231:20-cv-00073California4,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED JAY JACKSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00073-ADA-SKO

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

L. D. GRIFFITH, (Doc. 34) Defendant.

14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 Plaintiff Fred Jay Jackson seeks to hold Defendant Griffith liable for a violation of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 34.) Plaintiff has opposed the motion (Doc. 37), and Defendant has filed a reply brief (Doc. 38). I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his complaint on January 15, 2020. (Doc. 1.) In its First Screening Order issued May 22, 2020, the Court found Plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff was directed to file either a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.