Robertson

Robertson v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20231:23-cv-00975California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN ROBERTSON, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00975-ADA-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al, PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 3, 6, 8)

16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Jonathan Robertson (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, initiated this civil rights action on June 29, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 3, 6.) On July 7, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP be denied, and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee or face dismissal of the action. (ECF No. 8.) The Magistrate Judge provided Plaintiff fourteen days to file objections to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.