(PC) Barnes v. Lavorato, Jr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20232:23-cv-00534California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 2:23-cv-00534-DJC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SAM LAVORATO, Jr., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On May 25, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 22 days. The Court observes that this procedure is sufficient to constitute notice to the 23 Plaintiff of the potential disqualification under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) as required by 24 Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1120. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and 25 recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.