Reyes

(PC) Jeter v. Reyes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20231:23-cv-00110California431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO JETER, Case No.: 1:23-cv-0110 JLT SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

REYES, et al., DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE THE CASE

Defendants. (Doc. 14) 16 Antonio Jeter seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 17, 2023, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), and found Plaintiff did not state a cognizable claim upon which relief could be granted. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff was granted 21 days to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 13.) The Court also informed Plaintiff that if he failed to do so, the magistrate judge would “recommend that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to prosecute.” (Id., emphasis omitted.) After Plaintiff did not file an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.