Soto
(PC) Dukes v. Soto
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARNELL DUKES, No. 1:21-cv-1570 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE
v. ACTION, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THIS ACTION
TAMMY SOTO and JOHN PEARCE, (Doc. 12) Defendants. 16 Darnell Dukes seeks to hold the defendants liable for deliberate indifference to his serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (See Doc. 11.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim, and further leave to amend would be futile. (Doc. 12 at 5-9.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without leave to amend. (Id. at 10.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff on the same date, and it notified him that any objections must be filed within 14 days. (Id.) The Court also informed him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on…