Vasquez

(PC) Lindsey v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20231:23-cv-00991California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGJUAN DONNELL LINDSEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-0991 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

v. DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

VASQUEZ, et al., (Doc. 12) Defendants. 16 The assigned magistrate judge issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff did not file a response. The magistrate judge then found it was “clear from the face of the complaint that Plaintiff filed suit prematurely without first exhausting his administrative remedies in compliance with the PLRA, section 1997e(a).” (Doc. 12 at 3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections must be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 3.) The Court also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.