Alo

Alo v. Goldsmith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20231:23-cv-00536California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALCAPONE ALO, Case No. 1:23-cv-0536 JLT SAB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE CASE

CAROLE GOLDSMITH, et al., (Doc. 9) Defendants. 16 The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found the complaint did not state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 7.) The Court served the on Plaintiff, and it notified him that he was required to file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Id.) The Court further indicated: “[i]f Plaintiff fails to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this order, the Court will recommend to the district judge that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order, failure to prosecute, and for failure to state a claim.” (Id. at 22 (emphasis omitted).) Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint and did not otherwise respond to the Court’s order or file any additional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.