Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20231:16-cv-01212California1,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

REVIEW AND CORRECT DEPOSITION

vs. TRANSCRIPT, AND GRANTING EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION

ARNETTE, et al., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. (ECF No. 141.)

DEADLINE:

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

17 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s ADA claims against Defendants Keener, Gonzalez, Flores, Arnett, and Zamora; Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Keener and Gonzalez; and Plaintiff’s due process claims against Defendants Keener and Gonzalez. (ECF, Nos 47 & 131). On August 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel and a motion for extension of 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.