Escobedo

Escobedo v. Vides Guardado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20231:23-cv-00329California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00329-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

ADDRESS STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

v. AS TO NON-APPEARING DEFENDANT

MARIA GLORIBEL VIDES GUARDADO, (ECF No. 23) et al., THREE DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 15 On September 6, 2023, a stipulation was filed by the appearing Defendants, dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 23.) One Defendant, Maria Gloribel Vides Guardado Doing business as Mariscos El Patron Mexican Food, has not appeared in this action. The filed stipulation does not specifically state whether the claims against the non-appearing Defendant are to be dismissed with prejudice as well, however, the filing does indicate that the action is to be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.