Fisher
(HC) Bisel v. Fisher
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, No. 1:17-cv-00013-ADA-SKO (HC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
v. TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL, AS
PERMITTED BY FEDERAL RULE OF
RAY FISHER, JR., et al., APPELLATE PROCEDURE 4(a)(5)(C), AND
DENYING APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF
Defendants. APPEAL AS UNTIMELY (ECF Nos. 97, 106) 17 18 I.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
20 Petitioner and Appellant Gregory Eugene Bisel (“Appellant”) is a state parolee proceeding 21 pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 26, 2023, 22 this Court adopted the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, denying Appellant’s 23 petition for writ of habeas corpus and declining to issue a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 24 95.) Judgment was entered that same day. (ECF No. 96.) 25 On March 3, 2023, Appellant filed a motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file an 26…