Warden

(HC) Oatis v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20232:23-cv-01526California468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRUMAINE OATIS, No. 2:23-cv-1526 TLN CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, NORTH KERN STATE

PRISON,

15 Respondent. 16 On August 7, 2023, the court ordered that petitioner pay the filing fee for this action or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Petitioner was warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 26 1 Although it appears from the file that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.