Van

(PS) Andreyev v. Van

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20232:23-cv-01403California1,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE E. ANDREYEV, No. 2:23-cv-01403-DJC-CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMY VAN, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, Eugene E. Andreyev, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief for an alleged violation of his federal civil rights based on the seizure of his vehicle and its contents.1 Plaintiff’s complaint filed on July 13, 2023 (ECF No. 1), is before the court for screening. As set forth below, the allegations in the complaint do not state a claim, but plaintiff is granted 30 days from service of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has also filed an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) The application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. //// 27 1 This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Screening Requirement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.