Singh

Taj Transport Inc. v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20231:23-cv-00085California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TAJ TRANSPORT INC., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00085-JLT-EPG Plaintiffs, ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE, GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL, AND

REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW

RASANJIT SINGH, et al., CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 23, 27)

16 On September 8, 2023, the Court held a hearing on the motion of Attorney Ashley DeGuzman to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs, also addressing the upcoming scheduling conference and Plaintiffs’ future litigation of this case. (ECF Nos. 23, 27). Attorney DeGuzman appeared as did defense counsel, Attorney Gregory Blueford; however, no Plaintiff, or attorney 20 on behalf of any Plaintiff, appeared. 21 For the reasons stated on the record, the Court will grant Attorney DeGuzman’s motion to 22 withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs. 23 Additionally, as it is uncertain whether Plaintiffs intend to litigate this case further, the 24 Court will vacate the scheduling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.