Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20231:21-cv-01461California1,911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

v. (ECF No. 107) C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, filed July 25, 2023. (ECF No. 107.) I. BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 59.) On June 5, 2023, Defendant Anderson filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.