(PS) Rhuma v. State of Libya
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 TAHER RHUMA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-02366-DJC-AC-PS 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. ORDER
STATE OF LIBYA,
14 Defendant.
Plaintiffs proceed in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On March 29, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one
days. (ECF No. 35 .) The Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed as to Plaintiff Mohamad Laham without prejudice for failure to prosecute and follow court orders, and as to Plaintiffs Taher Rhuma and Khadija Kanoun with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction based on res judicata. ( at 17.) Plaintiffs have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 37.)