Pfieffer
(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING DEFENDANT ANDERSON’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE
C. PFEIFFER, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Defendants. (ECF No. 91) 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant Anderson’s motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, filed June 5, 2023. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the…