Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20231:21-cv-01461California4,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING DEFENDANT ANDERSON’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

C. PFEIFFER, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Defendants. (ECF No. 91) 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant Anderson’s motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, filed June 5, 2023. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.