(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20231:22-cv-00160California5,684 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, No. 1:22-cv-00160-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

v. (ECF No. 54) KEN CLARK, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed June 16, 2023. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendant O. Valladolid, failure to intervene claim against Defendants B. Camargo, Gamboa and T. Hieng, and retaliation claim against Defendants Gamboa and O. Valladolid. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on December 12, 2022. (ECF No. 38.) On February 15, 2023, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 48.) /// On June 15, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for partial summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.