Escobedo

Escobedo v. Vides Guardado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20231:23-cv-00329California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00329-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) MARIA GLORIBEL VIDES GUARDADO, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL et al., PROCEDURE 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 23, 25) 16 On September 6, 2023, a stipulation was filed by the appearing Defendants, dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 23.) The filed stipulation did not specifically state whether the claims against the non-appearing and defaulted Defendant were to be dismissed with prejudice as well. On September 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal indicating that Defendant Maria Gloribel Vides Guardado Doing business as Mariscos El Patron Mexican Food is also dismissed from this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 25.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ‘a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.