Santoro

(PC) Manago v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20231:21-cv-01616California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEWART MANAGO, No. 1:21-cv-01616-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

KELLY SANTORO, et al., ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF No 23.) 16 Plaintiff Stewart Manago is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 25, 2022, the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) and issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the Court dismiss this action due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff filed timely objections on August 12, 2022. (ECF No. 24.) In his objections, Plaintiff argues that the Court should serve the SAC on Defendants because it states cognizable claims. (Id. at 4.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.